Analyzing Literature - Postmodernist and Poststructuralist Theories

To intend that one overture toward understanding a literary work is enough to traverse the understanding of a novel, a poem, or a lend is to limit this very understanding. The numerousness of theoretical approaches available always implies continuities and discontinuities among them and these overlapping and gaps must be taken into consideration. It means that to use up a certain term of thought does not mechanic tout ensembley exclude all the others because when much(prenominal) a choice is justified, it is needed to establish a intercourse with the other lines to evaluate in what sense they broaden or restrict a small depth psychology. The choice for which approach to use, though, becomes a hard task. It requires a nominal previous knowledge of the roll up of overcritical theories available and to lodge them to the accusives of ones criticism.\nIn the case of Saramagos, Vidals and Mailers novels, at that place is a similarity among them that may justify a critical study: they are all rewritings of the gospels, offering other views of rescuer Christs life. A possible buttive of a critical analysis of these novels could be a relative study between them and the scriptural narratives, as an attempt to provide, relieve and understand the singings that merge those texts.\nConcerning probable critical theories which could mount this analysis, one important survey to be considered is that those theories must respectfulness as relevant the invention of intertextuality, since the corn of the analysis is the relation between the three novels and the Bible. Thus, objectivist theories such as bracing literary criticism and Russian Formalism wouldnt be suitable as main(prenominal) support, since they postulate that the meaning of a literary work is to be found in a close reading of it, without any(prenominal) external dealing. To recognize intertextuality relations among texts is to imply that their understanding is dependent and this idea refutes entirely the New Critics view that the poetic object is a unique sys...