Explain key differences between the ‘quantitative revolution’, Marxism and the ‘cultural turn’ and assess the way these approaches have influenced geographical research

formulate key differences between the numerical regeneration, Marxism and the cultural rise and assess the way these approaches stick emerge influenced geographical query\n\n geographics as a check had been dominated by regional geographics for much of the freshman half of the twentieth century. Geographers picked out regions to study, and then analyzed the strong-arm and cultural processes that made those regions uncomparable. A region contains a special, droll, and in some ways akin combination of kinds or categories of phenomena (Schaefer 1953) and the singularity of e genuinely region was much(prenominal) that the only generalization that could be made about these regions was that they were unique (Peet 1998).\n\nBut Schaefer was unhappy with geographics being classified in this way. He felt that there were regularities between the relative unique positions of phenomena, and thus spatial patterns and morphological laws existed (Bennet 1985). This led to the birth of the quantitative gyration, where geographers foc apply their studies in researching these patterns and laws, and sought to exempt them aim lore.\n\nJohn Marshall argues that geography had always been a science by virtue of the feature it is a truth-seeking discipline whose bargon materials consist of experimental observations (Marshall 1985). When the revolution began in the 1950s, examples already existed of empirical observations being used to formulate phenomena in human geography. Christaller used mathematical models in his rally place theory (1933) to explain the way people fixed out the inhabited beautify because he had observed that in like manner sized settlements were equidistant from each(prenominal) other. An example of such a study from the time of the revolution would be MacArthur and Wilsons possibleness of Island Biogeography (1969) which seeks to explain how islands and other habitat islands are colonized by flora and fauna. It is based on the obser vation that islands far from the mainland usually consider different and sometimes completely unique biogeographies, and the authors use some very manifold mathematical equations to show how this phenomenon occurs.\n\n some people were however very critical of this approach to geography, specially the positivist (scientific) side to it. The critics arguments are based on the fact that the positivist approach was supposititious to be value free, still as human geography is a social science, and the geographers doing the research are part of society, they have their own values which needs influence their studies (Cloke et al 1991). some other criticism came from Gould (1970) who argued that, with the exception...If you want to trounce a full essay, devote it on our website:

Buy Essay NOW and get 15% DISCOUNT for first order. Only Best Essay Writers and excellent support 24/7!